----- Original Message -----From: Elizabeth DiCarloSent: Friday, July 31, 2009 6:43 AMSubject: Re: [BellaAndEdward] 'Twilight': The Rachelle Lefevre-Summit dispute -- Whose side are you on?
I believe that Summit was looking for an excuse to fire Rachelle. It seems they had the other actress already in mind. In the wings so to say.It may be that Summit felt that Bryce may be a "Bigger name ". There is an old saying"If it ain't broke don't fix it".The Twilight movies are a gigantic hit, why mess with success. >Well, that makes them jerks and idiots---and you know, if I wasn't already not going to see the next two movies, I would be boycotting them. Obviously I'm not the only one feeling that way in regarding to a poll. Okay---makes them LOSERS too. And not very humane. If it's true they were just looking for a way to fire her, without telling her they didn't think she was right for the part---hope she sues the pants off of them. Or gets major compensation for this happening to her. Who's in the wrong---not the actress for sure. You know, I hope it blows up in their faces and it seems to be starting too, with all the negative publicity. At least it might start replaces some of the non-existant dating of Rob and Kristen. And btw---what is the reaction to the actors on the movie? I hope it's not---they know best.I think those idiots have been watching too much of the later years of Smallville---because it certainly excelled in inconsistancies. :: sigh :: Sorry about the rants there but it really makes me see red when stuff like this happens. :: grrrrr :: Prolific Peggy.
.![]()
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment